CASE COMMENTARY – SHAIK AHMED V. STATE OF TELANGANA (2021)

AUTHOR – SHRIHARIHARAN G, STUDENT AT SATHYABAMA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Best Citation – SHRIHARIHARAN G, CASE COMMENTARY – SHAIK AHMED V. STATE OF TELANGANA (2021), JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ETHICS (JRE), 1 (1) of 2023, Pg. 20-23, APIS – 3920 – 0019 | ISBN – 978-81-961097-1-4.

I. Abstract:

       On the increasing technologies and the mankind the crimes also advanced and grown to new methods as the crime in talk, the kidnapping also one of the important and the most common crime out there which also gets new and improved as the days moving. Back to 1673, the kidnapping was originated by the American Colonies which carried out the practice of stealing children for selling them as slaves and laborers. In the olden days the kidnapping was only done to make the children as slave. The word in its meaning has two parts kid and the napping which means stealing or snatching the kid for some benefits. The ways the crime happens was purely by the thinking capacity of the criminal or the motive of the kidnapping. If the main motive of the kidnap was for ransom, then the high profile, high earning capacity people would be targeted and they leave the rest others. As the growing period of era, the most common kind of kidnap was kidnapping for ransom. Kidnapping for ransom is one of the main method were the   kidnappers ask for money to the victim’s family, relatives, friends and the office employer in order to handover the kidnapped person. So as the period evolves and the crime evolves, the judicial also should get evolved and equipped for facing the future of crimes, thus this case would bring out the advanced judicial in the crime of kidnapping.

II. Keywords:  Kidnapping, crime, judicial, IPC, Evolves, judgement, case, commentary, victim, criminal